Below is the begining section of my newest novel. I have been writing novellas and short stories, but this story is working into a longer offering. I hope those who find it, enjoy this short begining section, Peace DAP
*The Beginning*
This
story begins in a small, deep southern Alabama town where everyone says they
know their neighbors, but in reality these folks keep mostly to themselves. The
people who live here are relying on themselves and each other and expect their
neighbors to do the same. In other words, it’s perfectly fine to receive help
from neighbors, but if folks rely on the government for support, they are
looked at differently. It is late summer and hot. The days can reach well over
one hundred degrees with the nights providing some relief from cool winds
blowing from the Appalachian Mountains in the north. The mostly brick homes
were built after WWII by returning soldiers. The yards and houses have been
maintained over the years by those who settled in long after the war.
This
story is about Mato Crow, who currently lives in this small and small-minded
community. It follows his bewildering journey to find his birth mother who is
believed to live out west. Although Mato has no recollection of his first year
with his biological mother he understands why he was removed from her care. His
mother, Nina Crow, a full-blooded Sioux from South Dakota was fifteen when she
became pregnant. She surrendered her son
at the hospital and quickly returned to her people, trying to forget about him
and move on with her young life. Mato knows he was adopted and that his
biological mother is an American Indian. Other than that, he knows nothing of
his past or people. His parents, the ones who adopted him, have raised him
within their own cultural understandings, which is a typical white, Christian,
southern upbringing.
If sex, violence or tales of human
misfortune bother you, this is a story to avoid. However, it seems unclear how
anyone capable of reading this story could go through life without experiencing
some kind of tragedy. Who is the eighteen-plus year old human who says they
have not suffered some kind of harm in their life? All humans suffer, some more
than others. If you have been blessed without any trauma in your life, then yes…you
are a fortunate individual. Do not fret though, harm certainly awaits you. Harm
is patient and unflappable. So, the issue is not if trouble will come into your
life, what matters most, is how you respond when it does. There are some harm
that happen to people that can alter their core – the very essence of who they
are as human beings. No amount of therapy or time can heal some wounds.
Also,
there are humans that, regardless what has happened throughout their life, they
would not change one tiny episode, good or bad, for fear it would have altered
where they are in their current life. They realize that any harm they suffered
is a blessing. Tragedy can, in fact, improve a life. Unfortunately, harm’s
impact is not known until it is experienced.
Mato
will experience tragedy along his path. He will also be the cause of some
hardships. Again, this story is not about exposing harm for harm’s sake, but to
witness Mato’s story and his reactions to these events. It is an effort of
trying to understand how life’s natural trials result in many different
outcomes. Do not look away when devastation approaches during this story. Nor
search for blame when it arrives. Blame should not be a concern and searching
for it is a waste of energy.
Who
is to blame when a tsunami causes a tragedy? It could not be a human that
caused such a tragic event. Is it god or
some kind of greater power?
If
god or a higher power is to blame for a tsunami and that provides some
self-comfort, then so be it. When human self-will is the result of suffering,
does god play a role? An out-of-control self-will is just as devastating to
humans as a giant tidal wave. Our reaction to tragedy is rooted within the
context of whether that tragedy is viewed as the result of god’s will or
human’s self-will.
For
instance if a man drowns a child, our natural response has a clear path forward
– hate the man and grieve the child. If a child drowns as the result of a
tsunami, our response becomes more complex. The child is easily grieved, but our
other emotional reaction – anger – gets no relief. Finding and applying blame
to a harmful event is like applying medicine to an injury.
Mato’s
story will provide no relief when disaster happens. Sometimes self-well and
god’s will are not clear when tragic events happen. And when certain events
happen in Mato’s story do not look for one or the other. It might be best, if
assigning blame is needed, that is if you need to apply medicine to your own
wounds, to consider both god and self-will’s influence. Can one will really
exist without the other?
No comments:
Post a Comment